Get Motivated

Home, Travel and Food: together they make up more than 60% of the average UK resident's carbon footprint. Here you'll find the latest news, research and ideas to help you cut their impact.

Is it time to stop eating beef?Print

Did you know that the livestock sector generates more greenhouse gases than the entire world’s transport system?

The UN has estimated that producing 1kg of beef creates, on average, the same amount of CO2 as driving 250km in a typical European car. And CO2 is by no means the only greenhouse gas released through the farming of cattle. No surprise then that, according to the United Nations, "livestock is one of the most significant contributors to today's most serious environmental problems."

What's the beef?

The environmental impact of different types of meat comes down to time. Tyically, the longer it takes to raise an animal, the more energy is required and the bigger the CO2 emissions.

It's about 1,000 days before a cow is ready to be turned into steak - that's two and a half times longer than the 400 days required for pork and 20 times more than the 50 days needed to rear a chicken.

Our hunger for meat is making matters worse

As many parts of the world become richer, hunger for meat and meat products is growing. According to a report by the United Nations, global meat production is projected to more than double from 229 million tonnes in 1999/2001 to 465 million tonnes in 2050, making global livestock the fastest growing agricultural sector.

The large amount of land required to rear cattle also has an environmental impact. Livestock now use up to 30% of the Earth's entire land surface, which has contributed to deforestation. Some 70% of former forest land in the Amazon is now used for pasture.

There's also the environmental impact of the vast quantities of grain needed to feed the cows, not to mention the CO2 emissions that result from creating manure and fertiliser to grow these crops.

There's more hot air

Cows have special stomachs to process the plant material they eat. One of the by-products of their digestive process is methane gas, which is exhaled at either end.

Like CO2, methane is a greenhouse gas. Research has found that 200 cows produce the equivalent amount of global warming potential each year as a family car being driven 111,850 miles. And while CO2 emissions have increased by 31 per cent during the past 250 years, methane, which has a higher warming potential and a longer lifetime in the atmosphere, has increased by 149 per cent during the same period.

Is it time to go veggie?

While eating beef has an impact on the environment, this doesn't mean that we all have to turn vegetarian. Removing beef from your diet could help you reduce your CO2 hoofprint, but there are other ways you can make a difference.

Four ways to reduce your CO2 hoofprint

  • Buying meat from a local farmer could reduce the amount of CO2 emitted from transport associated with its sale
  • Eat less beef and the amount you eat each time. Instead, swap beef for chicken. It requires less energy to produce and creates less methane than beef[7]
  • Opt for organic beef which is typically less reliant on fossil fuel-based fertilisers and pesticides
  • Buy meat that is reared on steep hills and mountains, such as upland sheep farms in Wales. These rocky pasturelands can be used for little else (and didn't cause any deforestation)

Key facts

  • The UK per capita consumption of beef is 17.3 kg a year 
  • The UN has estimated that producing 1kg of beef creates, on average, the same amount of CO2 as driving 250km in an average European car

 

Sources

[1]  The livestock sector is a major player, responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2 equivalent. This is a higher share than transport.
Information Source: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Livestock's Long Shadow - Environmental Issues and Options

[2] Every chicken you eat was clucking around being a chicken for roughly 50 days. So the steady consumption of half a pound a day of chicken requires about 25 pounds of chicken to be alive, preparing to be eaten. And those 25 pounds of chicken consume energy. Pork, madam? Pigs are around for longer - maybe 400 days from birth to bacon - so the steady consumption of half a pound a day of pork requires about 200 pounds of pork to be alive, preparing to be eaten. Cow? Beef production involves the longest lead times. It takes about 1000 days of cow-time to create a steak. So the steady consumption of half a pound a day of beef requires about 500 pounds of beef to be alive, preparing to be eaten.
Information Source: Sustainable Energy by D.J.C. Mackay (2009), (Page 77)

[3] Global meat production is projected to more than double from 229 million tonnes in 1999/2001 to 465 million tonnes in 2050, while milk output is set to climb from 580 to 1043 million tonnes.
Information Source: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Press release 'Livestock a major threat to environment'

[4] A single herd of cows can produce annual emissions of methane roughly equivalent in energy terms to using 21,400 litres of petrol to drive a family car 180,000 km
Information Source: Dr Andy Thorpe, an economist at the University of Portsmouth

[5] Organic food is good for many reasons, including local biodiversity and reduced reliance on fossil fuel-based fertilisers and pesticides
Information Source: WWF, Think about what you eat (What about organic section)

[6] The UK per capita consumption of beef is 17.3 kg a year, well below the consumption rate of beef in Argentina at 68 kg a year per capita, yet theUK, particularlyScotland, has more health problems and levels of obesity than Argentina.
Information Source: National Beef Association
 
[7] The UN has estimated that producing 1kg of beef creates, on average, the same amount of CO2as driving 250km in a European car
Information Source: A. Kirby, UN Guide to Climate Neutrality, 2008,  (Strategic communication, p188 (graphic))

Team Green Britain and London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Ltd (LOCOG) do not endorse any of the products, companies, organisations, opinions or websites that have been mentioned in this article. The content of this article has merely been provided as background to, or discussion on, various topical issues relating to the environment and it is not necessarily representative of the views of Team Green Britain and LOCOG. Further, any figures and calculations noted in this article are estimates (unless otherwise specified), and may vary in light of numerous factors and readers are advised to undertake their own research in relation to the facts and figures applicable to their particular circumstance. Certain facts and figures shown have been sourced from third parties. Team Green Britain has not verified information sourced from third parties and Team Green Britain cannot take responsibility for the accuracy of these facts and figures.

A growing community

Here's how Team Green Britain has grown since our launch in 2009